In Defense of SWTOR’s Subscription Launch from Gamasutra | General Discussion | Forums

AAA
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In

Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Go to Bottom
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
This topic is lockedNo permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
In Defense of SWTOR’s Subscription Launch from Gamasutra
sp_BlogLink Read the original blog post
Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
September 5, 2020
1:04 pm
Avatar
Lisa Clark

Staff
Forum Posts: 1909
Member Since:
March 18, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
Go to Top
1sp_Permalinksp_Print
0

Image Enlarger

Gamasutra writer Simon Ludgate has an interesting blog today about SWTOR’s subscription launch and his experience in the beta of the game, which was fairly short-lived. Find out why he believes BioWare did the right thing by launching with a sub model and moving to a f2p model once they were unable to hold the numbers in subscriptions.

Here’s a snippet:

When I played the Star Wars: The Old Republic beta, I thought to myself that the game was fun, but that I would never pay a subscription for it. It lacked the key element of MMORPGs: players playing together in a persistent, mutable world. While it had nice graphics, decent gameplay, interesting storylines, and an amusing group story participation dynamic, it had no strong foundation as a “massively” multiplayer game. At best, a one-time box purchase with private multiplayer, kinda like Borderlands; but certainly no justification for a subscription.

He goes on to explain how the game sounded interesting enough for him to want to try and write about but that when he asked his EA PR contact, he was never given a response (you’re not alone, my friend). He says “The game launched to all sorts of media fanfare and box sales, but I wasn’t among those playing the game at that point. EA apparently didn’t want to hear what I had to say about the game, and life went on.”

He goes on to explain the free to play model but defends SWTOR’s launch on a subscription model, despite his lack of having a chance to try it out as a member of the video game press. He takes the approach from a marketing perspective- something I respect and agree with and I think he has some pretty good points about the game.

He says:

Launching as a subscription game means selling lots of boxes and profit-boosting collector’s editions and it means 100% monetization rate in terms of required subscription fees. That is to say that everyone playing the game is giving you some money; and arguably pretty decent money at that. Even if people are just curious and want to try out the game, you’re getting that boxed game sale or digital download edition, which is more than a month’s subscription.

And again, I agree from a marketing perspective. Head on over and read the full blog post for more. It’s a good, intelligent read with a lot of great points. Even if you don’t agree that SWTOR did the right thing by launching with the sub model, you’ll still see he makes a valid argument.

This topic is lockedNo permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: Europe/Copenhagen

Most Users Ever Online: 497

Currently Online:
21 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Philip Thalberg: 25

Brad: 14

Chris: 12

perkings: 9

sah: 9

Soper1942: 9

Nigel_Davis: 7

Dann Albright: 6

Kira: 6

Rondof: 5

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 289

Moderators: 2

Admins: 3

Forum Stats:

Groups: 7

Forums: 11

Topics: 5260

Posts: 5343

Newest Members:

Kendevia, cannon1, ZacharyEdwards, arglebargle, antonysmith1990, Aniend1968, narppeasant, Honialal, Perara, AashnaSharma

Moderators: Peter Andersen: 88, Mikkel: 0

Administrators: Soeren Kamper: 3183, Lisa Clark: 1909, Versed: 8